Students debate impeachment of Parks
Zach Childree
Issue date: 11/13/08 Section: News
| |
|
Senator Bryant Whaley addressed the situation and asked for clarification from Parks about what the incident entailed and his involvement. Parks refused to discuss the incident.
Senator Eric Osborne then made a motion to begin impeachment proceedings saying Parks could then defend himself to the Student Judiciary Council behind closed doors.
"If the only explanation we're going to get is 'no comment' then I suggest we move forward with impeachment," Osbourne said. "It isn't necessarily to remove him from office, but he goes before the judiciary to face charges."
The motion sparked heated discussion among the senators, though many said they had not heard of an incident involving Parks before Monday night.
Senator Michael Finn said he thought the SGA's time could be better spent on other issues facing students.
"At this time I do not believe the senate has any reason to go with the impeachment process," Finn said. "Vice President Parks has not been convicted of any crime and at this time it should be kept in his personal life, not made public for rumors and hear-say to get started."
The motion wasn't seconded and died without coming to a vote.
Sources in the senate, speaking on terms of anonymity, said some in the senate were afraid to vote for the measure, as they feared retribution from the executive members of the SGA.
Another source involved in the SGA claims that President Nix acted to cover up the incident and keep it from other SGA members. Vice President of Organizational Affairs Destini Mayberry denied the charge.
"We haven't been pressured," Mayberry said. "It wasn't kept hush-hush."
Osborne said the fact that so many senators didn't know about the situation was evidence of an effort to cover up the incident.
"We've been kept in the dark," Osborne said. "There was obviously something going on."
While the SGA does not have a code of conduct in its constitution or code of laws, the university does have rules for student conduct on campus. Nix said the University knew about the incident and the University Judicial Coordinator who reviews student misconduct, had ruled there was no need for disciplinary action toward Parks.
Osborne said the motion was not a personal attack on Parks.
"I've been subject to questions from members of the Freshman Forum asking me what really happened [with Parks]," Osborne said. "Senator Whaley gave Vice President Parks an opportunity to defend himself, but he felt he did not need to dignify us with an answer."
Osborne said he didn't feel any pressure from the SGA leadership and that he wasn't afraid to speak up.
"Our main job is to represent the students," Osborne said. "Sometimes the SGA worries too much about popularity."
Finn said the SGA shouldn't have spent time on the issue.
"We are there to represent the student body and Monday night we were very self-focused," Finn said. "We have much larger issues that we need to be taking care of."
Osborne said the motion was an effort to be honest with the students the SGA represents. "We have been elected by the students and they need to know if these elected officials are not upholding the integrity of the office," Osborne said. "I think the biggest show of integrity is someone who is willing to answer for their actions."



Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 37
Ryan
posted 11/13/08 @ 7:06 PM CST
I think it is ironic that the students would hold impeachment hearings for a student that has done something wrong but the University continues to support someone like Meehan. (Continued…)
Upton Sinclair
posted 11/13/08 @ 11:34 PM CST
It's sad that the Senate did not support Mr. Osborne's efforts to maintain the integrity of the SGA and this University.
I don't ant my tuition dollars to fund an Individual such as Mr. (Continued…)
Najee Mosley
posted 11/14/08 @ 9:29 PM CST
I agree some what and also think that because of us putting Mr.Parks in the seat of VPSA doesn't mean we a have a right to display all of his wrong decisions or wrong duings publicly, because Mr. (Continued…)
Jessica
posted 11/15/08 @ 3:33 AM CST
Ive heard many stories about this incident, some from SGA members and some from not. Personally I'm glad this made front page. Why you may ask? WE as students elect these officials. (Continued…)
mike miller
posted 11/15/08 @ 9:00 AM CST
Since he recieves a money from JSU for his position unlike the Senate members and since apparently he is not in trouble I think he needs to be man enough to come foward and say what he did or didn't do. (Continued…)
SGA Senator Timothy K. Long
posted 11/15/08 @ 2:11 PM CST
It is great to see that the student body is reacting to this situation. I only wish that I could see just as much enthusiasm from my fellow students every Monday night at our Senate Meetings at 6:00pm on the 3rd floor of the TMB. (Continued…)
Jerry
posted 11/15/08 @ 2:19 PM CST
Senator Long,
It's not that he is guilty or not of domestic assault. it is that he was arrested while being an elected official, one paid for by my tuition dollars. (Continued…)
Sen. Eric Osborne
posted 11/15/08 @ 2:55 PM CST
First off let me say that i am glad that the student body has chosen to voice their opinions and let their voices be heard. I would just like to take this time to explain a couple of things. (Continued…)
Sen. Timothy K. Long
SGA Senator Timothy K. Long
posted 11/15/08 @ 3:53 PM CST
Jerry,
Once again I do appreciate your concern for this matter. It is quite funny how all of a sudden you are so concerned with how your tuition dollars are being spent. (Continued…)
Sen. Timothy K. Long
SGA Senator Timothy K. Long
posted 11/15/08 @ 4:11 PM CST
Sen. Osborne,
I'm not sure what constitutes you to have the judgment of whether I have a backbone or not. Like I stated, I'm proud of you for raising concern but don't let your ego get the best of you. (Continued…)
Post a Comment